Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.470
Filtrar
1.
Int Orthop ; 48(6): 1439-1452, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594586

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Congenital posteromedial bowing (CPMB) of tibia is a rare, usually self-resolving condition that is present at birth. The data on the long-term outcome of lengthening, choice of fixator, outcome in early and late age groups, and complications is sparse, hence the need for this study. METHODS: This retrospective study included 93 patients with 94 affected legs from 1991 to 2023. The patients were categorized into early (under 10 years) and late (10 years or above) intervention groups. Eighteen patients with nineteen lengthening episodes who attained skeletal maturity made the basis of this study and will be discussed in detail. RESULTS: The outcome for the lengthening group at maturity was satisfactory, with 5.53 cm of average length gained per lengthening episode, a mean LLD of 0.31 cm at final follow-up, a mean age of 23.63 years (range 14-38 years), and an average follow-up of 12.51 years (range 3-28 years) post-lengthening, but the procedure was associated with difficulties like ankle stiffness, tibial valgus, pin tract infections, and fractures through regenerate. CONCLUSION: This study represents a large single-centre series on CPMB. We recommend that surgery for lengthening should be done at an older age, close to skeletal maturity, wherever possible to reduce the risk of repeat lengthening procedures. Based on our experience, we recommend the use of a circular fixator. Uniplanar distractors should have an adequate number and spread of Schanz screws in each segment to reduce the risk of valgus malalignment of distracting segments of bone.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas , Tibia , Humanos , Adolescente , Tibia/cirugía , Tibia/anomalías , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Alargamiento Óseo/instrumentación , Niño , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 106(10): 906-911, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reduced hindfoot eversion motion has been proposed as a cause of increased lateral foot pressure following lateral column lengthening (LCL) for progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). A subjective intraoperative assessment of passive eversion has been suggested to help evaluate correction; however, it is unclear how passive eversion correlates with objective measurements of foot stiffness. Our objectives were to quantify the relationship between the maximum passive eversion in hindfoot joints following LCL with plantar pressure during stance and to determine the influence of wedge size on these outcomes. METHODS: Ten cadaveric specimens extending from the mid-tibia distally were tested on a 6-degrees-of-freedom robot to simulate the stance phase of level walking. Five conditions were tested: intact, simulated PCFD, and 3 LCL wedge conditions (4, 6, and 8 mm). Outcomes included the lateral-to-medial forefoot plantar pressure (LM) ratio during stance and the maximum passive eversion measured in the hindfoot joints. Simple linear regressions were performed to evaluate relationships between outcomes and wedge sizes. RESULTS: A strong negative relationship was found between passive subtalar eversion and the LM ratio during stance (r[38] = -0.46; p = 0.0007), but not between passive talonavicular eversion and the LM ratio (r[38] = -0.02; p = 0.37). Wedge size was strongly related to subtalar eversion (r[38] = -0.77; p < 0.0001), talonavicular eversion (r[38] = -0.55; p = 0.0003), and the LM ratio (r[38] = 0.70; p < 0.0001). Increased wedge size resulted in average decreases in subtalar and talonavicular eversion of 1.0° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8° to 1.3°) and 1.2° (95% CI: 0.6° to 1.6°), respectively. Increased wedge size also increased the LM ratio by 0.38 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.50), indicating a lateral shift in plantar pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased hindfoot eversion following LCL was related to increased lateral plantar pressure during stance. Increasing wedge size correlated with decreasing passive hindfoot eversion and increasing lateral plantar pressure, suggesting that intraoperative preservation of eversion motion may be important for preventing excessive lateral loading. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To avoid overcorrection or undercorrection of the deformity, hindfoot eversion assessment in addition to radiographic evaluation may be important for optimizing the amount of lengthening to achieve successful LCL.


Asunto(s)
Cadáver , Humanos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Femenino , Masculino , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Deformidades del Pie/cirugía , Deformidades del Pie/fisiopatología , Presión , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología
3.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 144(4): 1503-1509, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353685

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail in place is contraindicated per the manufacturer due to the concern of implant activation and migration. A prior in vitro study did not confirm these complications only noting that a 3.0 T MRI weakened the internal magnet. Therefore, a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic nail in place was performed to determine if any adverse effects occurred in the clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent an MRI with a magnetic lengthening nail in place was performed. The time spent being imaged in the MRI, number of times the patient entered the MRI suite, and the images obtained were recorded. Radiographs were performed before and after the MRI to determine if any hardware complications occurred. The patients were monitored for any adverse symptoms while they were in the suite. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients with 13 nails were identified. Two patients underwent imaging with a 3.0 T MRI while the remaining 10 underwent imaging with a 1.5 T MRI. Each patient entered the MRI suite 2.1 times and spent an average of 84.7 min being imaged in the MRI (range 21-494). No patients noted any adverse symptoms related to the nail while in the suite and no hardware complications were identified. CONCLUSION: MRI appears to be safe with a magnetic nail in place and did not result in any complications. Given the manufacturer's recommendations, informed consent should be obtained prior to an MRI being performed and a 3.0 T MRI should be avoided when possible if further activation of the nail is required.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Humanos , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Fémur/cirugía , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Clavos Ortopédicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
4.
Int Orthop ; 48(6): 1599-1609, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38421434

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) should be removed or changed at most two years after their implantation in the treatment of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) (Safety notice July 2021). However, in the face of patients at high risk of intraoperative complications and relying on the principle of auto-fusion of the spine, some surgeons would prefer a more wait-and-see attitude. The aim of this study was to report on patients who did not undergo final fusion at the end of the lengthening program with MCGR and to compare them with those who did. METHODS: This was a multicenter study with ten centres. We collected all graduate patients with EOS who had received MCGR between 2011 and 2022. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients had final fusion at the end of the lengthening program and 24 patients kept MCGRs in situ. The mean total follow-up time was 66 months (range, 25.3-109), and the mean follow-up time after final lengthening was 24.9 months (range, 3-67.7). Regarding the main curve and thoracic height, there was no significant difference in the percentage of correction over the whole follow-up between the two groups (p = 0.099, p = 0.176) although there was a significant difference between the end of lengthening and the last follow-up (p < 0.001). After completion of the lengthening program, 18 patients who had final fusion developed 24 of the 26 recorded complications (92.3%). CONCLUSION: Contrary to the manufacturer's published safety notice, not all patients systematically benefited from the removal of the MCGRs. Although arthrodesis significantly improved the scoliotic deformity, no significant difference was found in terms of radiographic outcome between patients who underwent spinal fusion and those who kept the MCGRs in situ.


Asunto(s)
Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Resultado del Tratamiento , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Alargamiento Óseo/instrumentación , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía
5.
Acta Orthop ; 95: 47-54, 2024 Jan 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38287909

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis in patients with achondroplasia is insufficiently reported. We aimed to perform the first study that exclusively analyzed simultaneous bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with motorized intramedullary lengthening nails via an antegrade approach in patients with achondroplasia focused on reliability, accuracy, precision, and the evolving complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective singlecenter study we analyzed patients with achondroplasia who underwent simultaneous bilateral femoral lengthening with antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails between October 2014 and April 2019. 15 patients (30 femoral segments) of median age 14 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12-15) were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 29 months (IQR 27-37) after nail implantation. RESULTS: The median distraction length per segment was 49 mm (IQR 47-51) with a median distraction index of 1.0 mm/day (IQR 0.9-1.0), and a median consolidation index of 20 days/cm (IQR 17-23). Reliability of the lengthening nails was 97% and their calculated accuracy and precision were 96% and 95%, respectively. The most common complication was temporary restriction of knee range of motion during distraction in 10 of 30 of the lengthened segments. 1 patient was treated with 2 unplanned additional surgeries due to premature consolidation. CONCLUSION: The method is reliable and accurate with few complications.


Asunto(s)
Acondroplasia , Alargamiento Óseo , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Osteogénesis por Distracción , Humanos , Adolescente , Osteogénesis por Distracción/efectos adversos , Osteogénesis por Distracción/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Uñas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Fémur/cirugía , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Acondroplasia/complicaciones , Acondroplasia/cirugía , Clavos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía
6.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 44(3): e249-e254, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38084006

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Femoral fracture after femoral lengthening in patients with achondroplasia and hypochondroplasia is a frequent complication, occurring in up to 30%. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of prophylactic intramedullary rodding in preventing this complication. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study involving 86 femoral lengthening procedures in 43 patients with achondroplasia or hypochondroplasia. Forty-two femora (21 patients) were prophylactically managed with intramedullary Rush rodding after external fixation removal (11 females and 10 males, mean age 14.6 years) compared with 44 femora (22 patients) without prophylactic intramedullary rodding (13 females and 9 males, mean age 15.2 years). The mean amount of lengthening in the rodding group was 13.3 cm (52.6%) with an External Fixation Index of 25.8 days/cm; in patients without rodding was 14.3 cm (61.5%) and 24.5 days/cm, respectively. RESULTS: Seven cases (15.9%) without rodding developed fractures. Four of them required surgical correction due to displacement or shortening. Only 1 patient (2.4%) had fracture of the femur after prophylactic rodding, and surgery was not required. The incidence of femur fracture was significantly lower in the prophylactic rodding group compared with the nonrodding group (2.4% vs. 15.9%, respectively; P =0.034). There were no cases of infection or avascular necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic intramedullary rodding is a safe and effective method for preventing femoral fractures after femoral lengthening in patients with achondroplasia or hypochondroplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-a retrospective comparative study.


Asunto(s)
Acondroplasia , Alargamiento Óseo , Huesos/anomalías , Enanismo , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Deformidades Congénitas de las Extremidades , Lordosis , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fémur/cirugía , Fijadores Internos/efectos adversos , Acondroplasia/complicaciones , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 18(1): 844, 2023 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37936235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fibular Hemimelia (FH) is the most common longitudinal limb deficiency. Significant limb length discrepancy (LLD) will necessitate long treatment times and multiple settings to compensate for LLD when associated with femoral shortening. This study evaluates the outcome of simultaneous femoral and tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov frame. METHODS: This retrospective study included the cases of 12 children with severe limb length discrepancy caused by combined FH and ipsilateral femoral shortening from May 2015 to August 2022. The total LLD ranged from 7 to 14.5 cm. All patients underwent single-session femoral and tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov ring external fixator technique. Additional procedures were performed in the same setting, including Achilles tendon lengthening, fibular anlage excision, peroneal tendons lengthening, and iliotibial band release. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 4 years. RESULTS: The planned limb lengthening was achieved in ten cases (83%). No cases of joint subluxation or dislocation were encountered. No neurovascular injury has occurred during the treatment course. In all cases, the bone healing index was better on the femoral side than on the tibia. Poor regeneration and deformity of the tibia occurred in two cases (16.6%). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous femoral and tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov fixator is a relatively safe procedure with the result of correction of total LLD in one session in a shorter time and less morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Ectromelia , Técnica de Ilizarov , Niño , Humanos , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tibia/cirugía , Ectromelia/diagnóstico por imagen , Ectromelia/cirugía , Ectromelia/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Peroné/cirugía , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/etiología , Pierna , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Pediatr Orthop B ; 32(6): 604-610, 2023 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37018750

RESUMEN

Several techniques have been described for decreasing the duration of external fixator use, augmenting stability, and minimizing complications. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical results and complications of femoral lengthening procedures using the Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) in combination with a single antegrade flexible intramedullary nail (FIN). Femoral lengthening with LRS and FIN was applied to 14 patients (aged 6-16 years) between 2017 and 2021. The etiology was a congenital femoral deficiency in 12 patients and post-traumatic growth arrest in two. A single nail was inserted antegradely through the trochanteric apophysis in each patient. Radiographs and medical records of the patients were assessed retrospectively. The mean lengthening achieved was 4.8 ±â€…1.0 cm. The mean duration of external fixation was 181 days (range 139-248 days) and the mean healing index was 39.6 ±â€…12.1 days/cm. The mean values of mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, mechanical lateral distal tibial angle, mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle, and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle were within the normal range at the last follow-up. Seven of the 14 cases had a regenerate deformity that caused a displacement of more than 2 mm in the mechanical axis deviation, none of them was greater than 10 mm and considered clinically insignificant. Fracture was seen in two limbs with regenerate deformity. This study suggests that LRS in combination with only one FIN may be an effective alternative for femoral lengthening, with acceptable complication rates.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas , Humanos , Niño , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Clavos Ortopédicos , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/cirugía , Fémur/anomalías , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Fijadores Externos
9.
Acta Orthop ; 94: 128-134, 2023 03 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36950849

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The retrograde femoral approach is an established technique for implantation of nails for leg lengthening and correction and in cases of distal femoral fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the 10-year outcome of this technique by analyzing the clinical long-term effects and radiological status of the knee after leg lengthening via a retrograde femoral approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 13 patients (median age at surgery 17 [range 15-20] years) who underwent unilateral, retrograde, femoral lengthening with a motorized nail. Outcome measurements were graded variables of the SF-36, ISKD score, and Lysholm score. MRI of both knees was performed in all patients. MRI was evaluated for the presence of degenerative changes and compared with the healthy contralateral knee. Cartilage condition was graded according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scoring system. RESULTS: All patients were pain-free and had a full range of motion 10 (range 10.0-12.2) years after surgery. All postoperative knees showed fibrosis of Hoffa's fat pad and moderate to severe cartilage defects (ICRS Grade 2-4) of the trochlear groove (nail entry site). 6 out of 13 operated knees exhibited retropatellar cartilage defects. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that patients were pain-free, but cartilage defects at the entry point and arthrofibrosis at Hoffa's fat pad were observed without causing clinical impairment.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Articulación de la Rodilla , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/cirugía , Radiografía , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 105(2): 113-127, 2023 01 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36651888

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails (MILNs) have gained popularity in recent years for the treatment of limb-lengthening discrepancies. We sought to catalog mechanical failures and their prevention and management in a large, single-institution series. We specifically assessed the rate of mechanical failures, the types of failures observed, and management strategies. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 377 patients (420 limbs) who underwent limb lengthening with early (P1) or later (P2) MILN iterations with ≥12-month follow-up. Mechanical failure was defined as mechanical breakage of the instrumentation or nail and/or failure of the internal lengthening mechanism. Failure assessment was arranged by lengthening phases and was sorted with a complication classification system. All lengthening and alignment parameters were assessed radiographically. RESULTS: Mechanical failure was observed in 40 nails (9.5%), most of which (63%) were corrected with an additional surgical procedure. The mechanical failure rate was 11.3% in P1 nails and 9% in P2 nails. Two nails failed the intraoperative distraction test, and 1 nail was found to have a broken washer during the insertion phase. Sixteen nails had mechanical failures in the lengthening phase. Some nails (8 of 16) required nail replacement surgery. Thirteen nails failed during the consolidation phase; 7 of these cases were managed by replacement with either a functional MILN or a conventional intramedullary nail. Eight failures happened during the extraction phase and were managed intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A 9.5% overall rate of mechanical failure of MILNs was observed in this large series. Resolution was achieved with an additional surgery in most cases. Nail distraction and weight-bearing compliance should be closely monitored during the lengthening and consolidation phases. Nail removal can be difficult and requires a careful study of radiographs for locking-screw bone overgrowth and backup removal equipment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Humanos , Fémur/cirugía , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Clavos Ortopédicos , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Fenómenos Magnéticos
11.
Injury ; 54(3): 983-990, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36658026

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to present our experience with a new modified Ilizarov technique of acute shortening and double-level lengthening (ASDL) for the management of large tibial bone defects after trauma and infection and compare it with bone transport (BT). METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was performed on 47 patients with large tibial defects after trauma and infection from June 2014 to June 2018. Depending on different Ilizarov methods, these patients were divided into ASDL group (n = 21) and BT group (n = 26). The difference in bone lengthening time, time in frame, external fixation index, docking site healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. Bone and functional results were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. Complications encountered in both groups were categorized according to the classification of Paley, including problems (treated nonoperatively), obstacles (treated operatively), and sequelae (unresolved at last). RESULTS: All patients were followed for at least two years since the lengthening frame was removed. All cases achieved complete union at the docking site and consolidation of the regenerate callus. The mean bone loss was 8.9 cm (range 6.5-16.0 cm) in ASDL group vs. 10.3 cm (range 5.2-18.5 cm) in BT group. The mean bone lengthening time was 2.4 ± 0.7 months in ASDL group vs. 4.1 ± 1.4 months in BT group (p<0.001); time in frame was 9.1 months (range 7.0-14.5 months) in ASDL group vs. 17.7 months (range 13.5-23.0 months) in BT group (p<0.001); and external fixation index was 1.04 months/cm (range 0.83-1.38 months/cm) in ASDL group vs. 1.91 months/cm (range 1.28-2.70 months/cm) in BT group (p<0.001). The incidence of obstacles occurred in ASDL group was significantly lower than that in BT group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the bone (p = 0.635) and functional results (p = 0.293) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with bone transport, our modified technique of acute shortening and double-level lengthening could reduce bone lengthening time, time in frame, external fixation index and postoperative complications. It showed better clinical effects in patients with large tibial bone defects after trauma and infection.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Técnica de Ilizarov , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tibia/cirugía , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos
12.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 107(2): 165-170, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35771378

RESUMEN

Limb length discrepancies (LLD) are quite frequent, especially in lower limbs. The evolution of the available devices and the refinement of the techniques for correcting the differences in limb length have progressively improved the approach to these deformities. Nevertheless, several points still remain debated. The aim of the study was to investigate the Italian pediatric orthopedic surgeons' choices in approaching and treating LLD in both lower and upper limbs. A survey on the treatment of limb length discrepancy was sent to a group of 11 Italian orthopedic centers, specialising in limb lengthening and belonging to the Italian Society of Pediatric Orthopedics and Trauma and the Italian Society of External Fixation. Despite improvements in knowledge of bone biology and distractional osteogenesis as well as the increase in available hardware for lengthening, many aspects of LLD correction still remain debated. Both the relative rarity of the conditions which lead to significant shortening and the lack of wide groups of patients analysed at adult age, continue to be the main limitations for every surgeon who deals with LLD. Only by overcoming our own convictions and sharing our experiences in multicentric studies, may we reach our goal of developing a shared treatment protocol.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Osteogénesis , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía
13.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 109(3): 103101, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34628087

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to analyze the outcomes of bone lengthening by external fixator associated with flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) in acquired limb length discrepancy (LLD). HYPOTHESIS: Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated FIN enables reduced External Fixation Index in limb lengthening for acquired leg length discrepancies in comparison to non-HA-coated FIN. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 54 patients (mean age, 17.9 years) operated on for femoral or tibial lengthening by combined technique (External fixator with FIN) for acquired length discrepancy. Titanium non-HA-coated FIN (29 cases) or HA-coated FIN (25 cases) were used. The factors that might influence external fixation index, complication occurrence and outcome were analyzed: age, amount of lengthening, nail diameter, HA-coating vs. non-HA-coated nails. RESULTS: The mean External Fixation Indexes (EFI) of groups compared for non-HA-coated nails vs. HA-coated nails were not significantly different: 26.5 d/cm and 27.2 d/cm in femoral lengthening and 34.9 d/cm and 31.7 d/cm in tibial lengthening. Positive correlation between the "nail diameter/inner distance between cortices at osteotomy site" ratio and EFI in tibial lengthening was revealed (p=0.034). The nail types and the "nail diameter/medullary canal diameter" ratio interact and have significant simultaneous effect on EFI in femoral lengthening (p=0.021). DISCUSSION: The results of this study revealed no differences with regards to EFI using HA-coated or non-HA-coated titanium FIN in lengthening for acquired leg-length discrepancies. Combined technique allowed reduced EFI and avoided major complications. Both non-HA-nail and HA-coated nail lengthening provided good and excellent outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; (controlled trial without randomization) prospective comparative study.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudios Prospectivos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Pierna , Titanio , Clavos Ortopédicos , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Fémur/cirugía , Fijadores Externos , Durapatita , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Z Orthop Unfall ; 161(3): 271-279, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés, Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35104903

RESUMEN

The treatment of complex injuries of the extremities after comminuted fractures or non-unions is a challenging area in the field of trauma surgery. Internal, motorized implants nowadays enable a patient-oriented and progressive treatment of these cases. The present article aims to present modern treatment strategies of complex injuries of the extremities, support the use of novel, motorized intramedullary nails and provide experiences for the handling with lengthening nails or transport nails. For this purpose, the preoperative planning including selection of patients, presentation of internal lengthening and transport systems and the most important factors during preparation of the surgery are described. Moreover, critical steps during the implantation of motorized nails and also during potential follow-up interventions are highlighted and the postoperative protocol including precise recommendations for the transport und consolidation phase are provided. Finally, the experiences are illustrated by presentation of the four different cases. The use of internal, motorized implants represents the latest step in the treatment of complex injuries of the extremities. These implants improve the quality of life and the authors recommend its use. However, these implants require a high expertise and adaption of established treatment protocols in these challenging trauma cases. Follow-up analyses with a considerably large number of cases are necessary and the research on implants to solve persisting problems in the area of complex injuries of the extremities has to be pursued intensively.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Humanos , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Calidad de Vida , Extremidades , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 33(5): 1981-1987, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36068330

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Publications evaluating the results of the ulna lengthening in congenital radial deficiency are based only on small groups of subjects which yield statistical studies of low scientific value. The aim was to examine the effectiveness of ulna lengthening in radial longitudinal deficiency and determine the number and quality of complications based on one of the most numerous study groups described in the literature. METHODS: The material consists of a study group with 31 upper limbs of unmatured patients diagnosed with type III and IV radial longitudinal deficiency. The study group was evaluated based on the parameters known from the literature. The difficulties during elongation were classified according to Paley's classification. RESULTS: The study group contained patients with a mean age of 9 years, and the number of boys and girls was comparable. Ulna length significantly increased after elongation compared to the initial bone length. The patient's age didn't affect the ulna lengthening, and the amount of elongation didn't significantly affect the total stabilization period. However, the total stabilization time increased with increasing patient age. Difficulties affected more than half of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Ulna elongation in congenital radial deficiency results in significant lengthening of the ulna, and thus the entire forearm, compared to the initial bone length. This technique has a high percentage of difficulty, so its use should be considered after cautious discussion with the parents and patients.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Osteogénesis por Distracción , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Osteogénesis por Distracción/métodos , Cúbito/cirugía , Cúbito/anomalías , Radio (Anatomía)/diagnóstico por imagen , Radio (Anatomía)/cirugía , Radio (Anatomía)/anomalías , Antebrazo , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos
16.
Artículo en Español | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1439186

RESUMEN

Braquimetatarsia es el acortamiento anormal de uno o más metatarsianos. Tiene una incidencia de 0.02%-0.05% predominando en mujeres de 25 a 1. En un 72% puede ser bilateral. La etiología no es clara pero se plantea el cierre prematuro de la fisis dando un retardo en el crecimiento. La mayoría de las veces presenta síntomas causados por alteración en la mecánica de la parábola metatarsal como dolor e hiperqueratosis. Puede existir metatarsalgia y agregar en la evolución desviaciones digitales adicionales. El principal motivo de consulta es estético. El objetivo del reporte es mostrar dos técnicas quirúrgicas y los resultados clínicos correspondientes usando el score AOFAS, además de los resultados imágenológicos con hasta 5 años de seguimiento. Se describen dos pacientes y se analizan dos técnicas quirúrgicas diferentes para alargar los metatarsianos. Se trata de alargamientos agudos con interposición de injerto intercalar, en un caso mediante el procedimiento de Sandro Gianini con injerto de cresta ilíaca y en el otro con injerto de metatarsiano adyacente con modificación de la longitud del segundo y tercer metatarsiano restituyendo en ambos casos la parábola metatarsal. Obtuvimos buenos resultados al igual que series numerosas pudiendo recomendarse en casos similares.


Brachymetarsal is the abnormal shortening of one or more metatarsals. It has an incidence of 0.02%-0.05%, predominantly in women from 25 to 1. In 72% it can be bilateral. The etiology is not clear, but premature closure of the physis is suggested, giving growth retardation. Most of the time it presents symptoms caused by an alteration in the mechanics of the metatarsal parabola, such as pain and hyperkeratosis. There may be metatarsalgia and add additional digital deviations in the evolution. The main reason for consultation is aesthetic. The objective of the work is to show the surgical technique and the clinical results using the AOFAS score, in addition to the imaging results with up to 5 years of follow-up. Two patients are described and two different surgical techniques to lengthen the metatarsals are analyzed. These are acute lengthenings with intercalary graft interposition, in one case using the S.Gianini procedure with an iliac crest graft and in the other with an adjacent metatarsal graft with modification of the length of the second and third metatarsals, restoring in both cases the metatarsal parabola. We obtained good results. results as well as numerous series and can be recommended in similar cases.


Braquimetatarsal é o encurtamento anormal de um ou mais metatarsos. Tem incidência de 0,02%-0,05%, predominantemente em mulheres de 25 a 1 ano. Em 72% pode ser bilateral. A etiologia não é clara, mas sugere-se o fechamento prematuro da fise, causando retardo de crescimento. Na maioria das vezes apresenta sintomas decorrentes de uma alteração na mecânica da parábola metatarsal, como dor e hiperqueratose. Pode haver metatarsalgia e adicionar desvios digitais adicionais na evolução. O principal motivo da consulta é a estética. O objetivo do trabalho é mostrar a técnica cirúrgica e os resultados clínicos utilizando o escore AOFAS, além dos resultados de imagem com até 5 anos de seguimento. Materiais e métodos: São incluídos dois pacientes e analisadas duas técnicas cirúrgicas diferentes para alongar os metatarsos. São alongamentos agudos com interposição de enxerto intercalar, em um caso utilizando a técnica de S. Gianini com enxerto de crista ilíaca e no outro com enxerto de metatarso adjacente com modificação do comprimento do segundo e terceiro metatarsos, restaurando em ambos os casos o metatarso parábola. Obtivemos bons resultados, bem como inúmeras séries, podendo ser recomendados em casos semelhantes.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Deformidades Congénitas del Pie/cirugía , Huesos Metatarsianos/cirugía , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Osteotomía , Huesos Metatarsianos/anomalías , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 42(10): e987-e993, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36084628

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limb lengthening by distraction osteogenesis can be performed with motorized internal devices, but intramedullary implants risk avascular necrosis of the femoral head in young children. A method of internal limb lengthening using a motorized expandable plate has been developed and preliminary results are presented. METHODS: Seven skeletally immature patients (ages 2.7 to 9.7 y) with congenital femoral deficiencies underwent femoral lengthening with the use of a magnetic expandable plate. Surgical details, lengthening parameters, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society-Angular deformity, Infection, Motion index, and complications were reviewed and classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: An average lengthening was 4.1 cm (range, 3.3 to 4.4 cm) comprising 18% of initial femoral segment length (range, 14% to 21%). The average lengthening phase was 50.2 days (range, 40 to 57 d) and weight-bearing was initiated at an average of 13 weeks from surgery (range, 8 to 18 wk). Limb deformities and length discrepancies were of moderate complexity, with an Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society-Angular deformity, Infection, Motion score of 6.57 (range, 6 to 7). Complication rates were comparable to previously reported methods of femoral lengthening. One patient underwent reoperation for patellar instability and 1 patient experienced radiographic hip subluxation which was observed. Small magnitude varus was observed in regenerate in 3 of 7 cases, none requiring treatment. Preoperative planning consisted of careful localization of the corticotomy site, acute deformity correction at the lengthening site in 3 cases, and implant orientation. CONCLUSIONS: Limb lengthening with motorized internal plates is feasible for young children with congenital femoral deficiency for whom intramedullary lengthening is unsafe or if external fixation is to be avoided. However, the fundamental principles of distraction osteogenesis and risks of lengthening for congenital discrepancies remain unchanged. Specific considerations herein include: careful planning of implant length and positioning, adjacent joint protection with adjunctive means, and mitigating deformity of the regenerate during distraction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Osteogénesis por Distracción , Articulación Patelofemoral , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Niño , Preescolar , Fémur/anomalías , Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Osteogénesis por Distracción/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Soins Pediatr Pueric ; 43(327): 16-19, 2022.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35995531

RESUMEN

Bone lengthening surgeries are difficult procedures for both the patient and the professional. Complications are common and pediatric orthopedists have been working to reduce them. The discovery of progressive bone lengthening was a first step in improving these procedures, followed by the advent of external fixators. More recently, internal lengthening systems have emerged as one of the greatest technological advances in these procedures. Bone lengthening with an electromagnetic nail, which is becoming increasingly popular, has drastically reduced the complications of these surgeries.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Niño , Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Soins Pediatr Pueric ; 43(327): 20-21, 2022.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35995532

RESUMEN

The Fitbone® system is one of the most recent motorized bone lengthening techniques. It allows a precise control of the extension while reducing pain and complications. It requires special assistance from the paramedical team, before and after the procedure, as it may cause adjustment problems in some patients.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas , Alargamiento Óseo/efectos adversos , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Clavos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Fémur , Humanos , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Injury ; 53 Suppl 3: S88-S94, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35851475

RESUMEN

The use of the intramedullary lengthening nail has gained in popularity over the last decade. The reduction in complications associated with the use of external fixators and excellent patient outcomes has resulted in the largest change in management of limb length discrepancy since the concept of distraction osteogenesis was accepted by the Western world in the 1980s. Success following "simple" limb lengthening has led to surgeons extending the indications for the lengthening nail, including different bone segments, lengthening associated with potential joint instability and lengthening combined with acute deformity correction. There has been a drive for further implant modification to reduce complications, and enable full weight bearing during the lengthening process. This would offer the opportunity to consider simultaneous limb lengthening. The aim of this review is to evaluate the literature published over the last five years and highlight important learning points and technical tips for these expanding indications.


Asunto(s)
Alargamiento Óseo , Osteogénesis por Distracción , Alargamiento Óseo/métodos , Clavos Ortopédicos , Fijadores Externos , Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas/cirugía , Osteogénesis por Distracción/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...